Welcome to AnesthesiaWeb Abbott Laboratoriesnavigation
Controlling Sepsis
 Duke University
  

Lit ReviewsAsk the ExpertsSpecial FeaturesFrom The PodiumResident's CornerCME/MeetingsUseful ResourcesArchive
buffer
   

 

July 17, 2001

Controlling Sepsis

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated Protein C for severe sepsis.
Bernard GR, Vincent J-L, et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:699-709.

Severe sepsis - a new treatment with both anticoagulant and antiflammatory properties.
Matthay MA. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:759-761.

Commentary by Douglas Coursin, M.D.

Sepsis remains a major cause of life threatening illness affecting approximately 750,000 Americans annually and resulting in at least 225,000 deaths. Sepsis is a leading cause of the acute respiratory distress syndrome and the major cause of morbidity, mortality, and prolonged length of stay in surgical intensive care units in the U.S. The etiology of sepsis continues to evolve and is related, in part, to an aging population, co-morbidities, antibiotic use and resistance, increased interventional therapy, and wider administration of potent immunosuppresants. Gram positive cocci are the leading cause of bacteria-induced sepsis, followed by enteric gram negative rod infections. The incidence of fungemia also continues to increase as we care for an older and more frequently immunosuppresed population.

As facets of a complex response to sepsis, generalized inflammation, activation of the procoagulant response and inhibition of fibrinolysis lead to diffuse endovascular insult resulting in microthrombosis and inhibited fibrinolysis. In severe cases of sepsis, this endovascular injury causes multiple organ dysfunction and death. Modern medicine and critical care have witnessed a tremendous therapeutic assault against sepsis. This attack includes aggressive current supportive care with resuscitation directed by minute-to-minute monitoring, hemodynamic intervention, nutrition, ventilatory support, and application of a growing armamentarium of antimicrobials. The overall sepsis-induced mortality remains frighteningly high at 30 - 50%, however, despite appropriate care.

Over the past twenty years a host of promising therapies have been evaluated and anticipated with great, but unrealized, expectations. These failed approaches included administration of high dose steroids; polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against endotoxin and various inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor alpha; receptor antagonists; anti-inflammatories; inhibitors of nitric oxide; anti-oxidants; and others. Some of these promising potential approaches lacked successful animal models and/or appeared appealing based on inadequately controlled, under powered or non-randomized studies.

The Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study is the first effective therapeutic intervention against sepsis since the introduction of antibiotics. This multinational study was performed in eleven countries at one hundred sixty four centers and included 1690 patients with severe sepsis. It showed a dramatic -- almost 20% -- decrease in overall mortality at twenty-eight days in patients treated with a 96 hour continuous infusion of a recombinant human activated protein C (APC) [drotrecogin alfa (activated)TM Eli Lilly].

APC is a serine protease and part of the natural anticoagulant system. It promotes fibrinolysis and inhibits inflammation and thrombosis. APC is an important modifier of coagulant and inflammatory cascades that are activated during severe sepsis. Its potential for success in severe sepsis was based on:

    1. APC levels are diminished in most patients with sepsis because of cytokine-induced down regulation of thrombomodulin, which is required to promote activation of protein C.
    2. APC inhibits factors V and VIII and decreases the formation of thrombin.
    3. APC activates fibrinolysis by reducing the formation of tissue plasminogen activator-1 (t-PA-1), which is overproduced during sepsis.
    4. Infused APC reversed procoagulant and inflammatory effects in baboons with gram negative sepsis. Treated baboons also had improved survival.
    5. A small phase II trial in humans treated with drotrecogin alfa resulted in reductions in the plasma levels of D-dimer and interleukin-6 (IL-6), markers of coagulation and inflammation, respectively.
    6. A recent report that treatment with APC improved clinical outcome in patients with severe meningococcemia (Blood 2000; 96:3719-24).

The PROWESS study was developed to monitor the effect of a prolonged infusion of drotrecogin alfa on D-dimer and IL-6, on end-organ function, and on outcome at twenty-eight days in patients with severe sepsis. Patients were also assessed for development of an antibody to APC. Severe sepsis was defined as known or suspected infection along with three or more signs of systemic inflammation (see Chest 1992; 101:1644-55) and sepsis-induced end-organ dysfunction that lasted no longer than twenty four hours. Study patients were enrolled and randomized within twenty four hours of identification to receive an infusion of APC or placebo. The groups were well matched in demographic characteristics, severity of illness (similar baseline APACHE II scores), incidence of positive cultures, etiology and site of infection, baseline levels of D-dimer and IL-6, and presence of protein C deficiency at study onset. Over half of the study patients had a pulmonary source of infection (53.6%) while an abdominal focus was identified in an additional 19.9%. Blood cultures were positive in approximately a third of all patients with Staph aureus, Strep pneumonia, and enteric gram negative rod infections being the leading causes of identifiable bacteremias.

Nine out of ten patients were protein C deficient while almost all patients had increased D-dimer and IL-6 levels at the time of enrollment. None of the APC treated patients developed a neutralizing antibody response to APC. The vast majority of treated patients had decreased D-dimer and IL-6 levels and increased APC levels during study drug infusion. There was a greater incidence of serious bleeding, however, in treated patients (3.5%) vs. control patients (2.0), but not an increased risk of second infection, thrombotic events or other major side effect.

Anesthesia care providers should take note of the exclusion criteria and concerns over risk of bleeding for enrolled patients undergoing procedures, surgeries, or developing coagulopathy. Along with classic exclusion criteria, thrombocytopenic patients (platelet count < 30,000); patients undergoing surgery with general or spinal anesthesia within 12 hours of beginning study infusion; patients with recent CNS surgery, trauma, or pathology; and patients with a history of hypercoaguable states such as AT, protein C, or S deficiencies or those with anticardiolipin antibody or lupus anticoagulant were excluded. Patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation were also excluded.

This study provides the first active therapy to have a positive impact on the outcome from severe sepsis in the current era of critical care. This improved survival was potentially secondary to APC limiting the enhanced coagulation and inflammation that develops in severe sepsis. APC provided a significant benefit with only modest increase in bleeding complications. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) is currently under active review by the FDA for possible release later this year. More data is necessary to completely establish the risk/benefit for septic patients with significant coagulopathy and to determine subsets of patients who may benefit from longer duration of infusion than the 96 hours used in the current study. The financial impact of this therapy may be marked depending on the cost and frequency of use.

A recent abstract report from a French multicenter study showed significant improvement in mortality in septic shock patients with relative adrenal insufficiency who were treated with low dose hydrocortisone, 50 mg every six hours, for a week. This was a very select population. The potential of additive benefit if APC and corticosteroids were concurrently administered is an interesting possibility that requires further study.


ABSTRACT

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated Protein C for severe sepsis.

AUTHORS:
Bernard GR, Vincent J-L, et al.

SOURCE:
N Engl J Med
2001; 344:699-709

ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND: Drotrecogin alfa (activated), or recombinant human activated protein C, has antithrombotic, antiinflammatory, and profibrinolytic properties. In a previous study, drotrecogin alfa activated produced dose-dependent reductions in the levels of markers of coagulation and inflammation in patients with severe sepsis. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed whether treatment with drotrecogin alfa activated reduced the rate of death from any cause among patients with severe sepsis.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Patients with systemic inflammation and organ failure due to acute infection were enrolled and assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of either placebo or drotrecogin alfa activated (24 microg per kilogram of body weight per hour) for a total duration of 96 hours. The prospectively defined primary end point was death from any cause and was assessed 28 days after the start of the infusion. Patients were monitored for adverse events; changes in vital signs, laboratory variables, and the results of microbiologic cultures; and the development of neutralizing antibodies against activated protein C.
RESULTS: A total of 1690 randomized patients were treated (840 in the placebo group and 850 in the drotrecogin alfa activated group). The mortality rate was 30.8 percent in the placebo group and 24.7 percent in the drotrecogin alfa activated group. On the basis of the prospectively defined primary analysis, treatment with drotrecogin alfa activated was associated with a reduction in the relative risk of death of 19.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6.6 to 30.5) and an absolute reduction in the risk of death of 6.1 percent (P=0.005). The incidence of serious bleeding was higher in the drotrecogin alfa activated group than in the placebo group (3.5 percent vs. 2.0 percent, P=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with drotrecogin alfa activated significantly reduces mortality in patients with severe sepsis and may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding.

Severe sepsis - a new treatment with both anticoagulant and antiflammatory properties.

AUTHOR:
Matthay MA

SOURCE:
N Engl J Med
2001; 344:759-761

ABSTRACT:
No abstract available.

A Vertibrae, Inc. Community

©1996-2003 by Vertibrae, Inc. and AnesthesiaWeb. All rights reserved. | Privacy policy